ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Starve-Feed Cycles Direct Quiescence to Proliferation Transitions in
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell quiescence is a reversible state in which cells temporarily exit the cell cycle but remain poised to re-enter, on cue. Robust protection of the balance between stem cell quiescence and proliferation (Q->P) is critical for long-term tissue health. Proliferation without proper resources drives disease states including cancer or birth defects. Conversely, extended periods of quiescence can lead to irreversible senescence, causing stem cell loss, aging symptoms, and vulnerability to oncogenic transformation. Diet is a central regulator of Q->P. Tissue stem cells are particularly impacted, entering periods of quiescence during nutrient restriction, with rapid induction of proliferation upon feeding. We demonstrated previously that the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is necessary and sufficient for controlling Q->P responses to dietary changes in epithelial Follicle Stem Cells (FSCs) in the fly ovary. The Hh effector, Cubitus Interruptus (Ci), is a transcriptional regulator that mediates the feeding response. To identify Ci-induced Q->P regulators, we labeled transcripts that are induced in FSCs during the 6-hour Q->P timecourse using thiouracil tagging (TU-tagging), and sequenced TU-tagged messages versus Input to prioritize candidates. Unexpectedly, cell cycle regulators were not induced, suggesting that other mechanisms control Q->P in FSCs. We describe a sequential screening approach that uncovered seven novel, feeding-dependent Q->P regulators, including a cholesterol transporter and, surprisingly, glial and neuronal regulators. Our results highlight the importance of dynamic regulation of gene expression for translation of dietary signals by stem cells, uncovering new pathways for mechanistic investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.