ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Effects of commercial unflavored and vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine intake and withdrawal.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The ratio of propylene glycol to glycerol modulates nicotine taste and reward: more glycerol, more reward.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) often contain flavors and solvents that may influence nicotine addiction. In this study, we characterized the dose-response relationship of commercial unflavored nicotine e-liquids and investigated the impact of vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine vapor self-administration (VSA) and withdrawal in rats. Male adolescent Sprague Dawley rats self-administered aerosols generated from commercial e-liquids containing 0, 3, 6, or 12 mg/ml nicotine in a propylene glycol (PG) and glycerol (G) vehicle. The vehicle (0 mg/ml nicotine) supported robust VSA, indicating the reinforcing effects of PG/G vapor. 3 mg/ml nicotine did not support VSA, while both 6 and 12 mg/ml nicotine concentrations produced significant reinforcement, with 6 mg/ml yielding the most stable responding. The 6 mg/ml concentration was selected for subsequent comparisons with vanilla-flavored e-liquids. Vanilla flavor (0 mg/ml nicotine) led to maintained VSA behavior, confirming its reinforcing effects. However, the combination of vanilla and nicotine (6 mg/ml) did not alter nicotine intake or withdrawal severity, as assessed by mecamylamine-precipitated somatic signs. Blood nicotine and cotinine levels were similar between nicotine and vanilla + nicotine conditions, indicating that vanilla flavor did not affect systemic nicotine metabolism. Additionally, the PG/G vehicle induced significant somatic signs, suggesting that vapor exposure itself, independent of nicotine, contributes to these physiological responses. These findings provide critical insights into the reinforcing and physiological effects of both nicotine and non-nicotine constituents in e-cigarette aerosols, underscoring the need for future studies and regulatory strategies that consider the abuse liability of flavors and solvents, such as PG/G, particularly among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.