ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Quantifying Cerebellar Signal Detectability in MEG and EEG in Epilepsy Using Anatomically Informed Source Modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The cerebellum is increasingly recognized as a key component of large-scale brain networks implicated in epilepsy, yet its electrophysiological characterization remains limited in noninvasive recordings. This limitation arises from the cerebellum's depth, complex folding, and unfavorable source orientations, which challenge conventional magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). Here, we quantitatively characterize cerebellar signal detectability across modalities and sensor configurations using anatomically informed source modeling at the population level. Methods: We analyzed clinical MEG and EEG recordings from a large cohort of patients with epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation. Cerebellar and cerebral source spaces were constructed using subject-specific anatomical models derived from routine clinical MRI, enabling consistent forward modeling across individuals. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was estimated at individual source locations and summarized at the regional level. In addition to clinical Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)-MEG and EEG, multiple on-scalp optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) configurations were evaluated through simulation, including layouts matched to clinical sensor geometries and layouts optimized for posterior fossa coverage. The effects of source orientation, sensor-source distance, and head size on SNR were systematically investigated. Results: In routine clinical recordings, cerebellar SNR was consistently lower than superficial cortical reference levels, confirming the limited detectability of cerebellar activity with standard SQUID-MEG and EEG. Reducing sensor-source distance by placing OPMs at SQUID-equivalent locations, i.e., projecting SQUID sensor locations to the scalp, did not improve cerebellar SNR, indicating that proximity alone is insufficient for better detectability of deeper sources. In contrast, cerebellar-optimized OPM layouts produced substantial SNR gains in posterior cerebellar regions. The effects of source orientation influence SNR differences between OPM and EEG (under identical sensor/electrode coverage) but were secondary to depth- and geometry-related constraints. Mediation analysis further demonstrated that relative sensor distance significantly mediated OPM-related advantages in posterior cerebellar regions, particularly in individuals with smaller head sizes. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that cerebellar signal detectability is governed primarily by anatomical depth and geometry rather than sensor proximity alone. Anatomically informed source modeling, combined with flexible and region-specific sensor layouts, enables meaningful improvements in cerebellar SNR that are not achievable with fixed-helmet systems. While directly motivated by epilepsy, this framework advances human brain mapping beyond the cerebrum by providing a principled approach for evaluating MEG and EEG sensitivity in deep and highly folded brain structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.