Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648136›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Speed-Dependent Turning Strategies in Quadrupedal Locomotion: Insights from Computational Modeling.

Yaroslav I Molkov, Mohammed A Y Mohammed, Tommy Stell, Amelia Harralson, Russell Jeter, Ilya A Rybak

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaroslav I MolkovDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-1974
Mohammed A Y MohammedDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tommy StellDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Amelia HarralsonNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Russell JeterDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-2387
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-349X

Funding

Limb coordination during locomotion before and after spinal cord injuryR01NS110550 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORIS I PRILUTSKY, Ilya A Rybak · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
Mechanisms of locomotor rhythm generation in rodent spinal cordR01NS130799 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Kimberly J Dougherty, Ilya A Rybak · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110550NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quadrupedal animals like mice navigate their environments through complex coordination of neural signals and biomechanical movements, enabling stable and directed locomotion. While many computational models simplify this process by assuming left-right symmetrical body movements and focusing on straight-line paths, real animals rely heavily on asymmetrical body movements to execute turns and adjust speed effectively. This study builds upon a previously developed model of quadrupedal locomotion proposed by (Molkov et al., 2024) in which forward movement of the body was driven by central neural interactions, biomechanics, and proprioceptive feedback. We extended this model to comparatively investigate possible mechanisms of steering by introducing three distinct asymmetrical strategies-body bending, lateral force application, and lateral limb shifting as well as their combinations-to explore their potential involvement in turning performance. By simulating these strategies across a walking speed range, we measured and compared their impact on turning curvature (the sharpness of the turn) and limb coordination. The latter was quantified through ratios of duty factors representing the relative time that a limb spent in contact with the ground compared to its counterpart on the opposite side. Our findings reveal that each strategy excels at different speeds: body bending allows sharp turns at low speeds, lateral force is most effective at medium speeds, and lateral shifting performs best at higher speeds. Our results suggest that animals select or combine turning strategies based on their locomotor speed or adjust speed to use a specific strategy. We also show that the forelimbs consistently play a primary role in steering, while the hindlimbs adjust propulsion and stability in ways that depend on the specific turning strategy. These results provide valuable insights into how spinal circuits and mechanical asymmetries work together to produce flexible, adaptive movement patterns, offering a robust framework for understanding locomotion in both biological organisms and robotic systems designed to mimic such behaviors.

Identifiers

PMID41648136
PMCPMC12871115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.