ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Hierarchical Reconfiguration of Neurocognitive Task Set Representations Mediates Cognitive Flexibility.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control organizes contexts, stimuli, and actions into hierarchically structured representations that support flexible, goal-directed behavior. This organization allows appropriate actions to be selected in response to changing demands, contexts, and sensory inputs. Critically, different hierarchical levels place unequal demands on flexibility: sensory-motor plans must be updated rapidly to enable behavioral flexibility, whereas higher-level contextual goals are typically updated less frequently. A behavioral consequence of managing these demands is the task switch cost, the performance penalty observed when task representations are reconfigured across trials. Here, we investigated the behavioral and neural sources of switch costs using a hierarchical control task that dissociates context reconfiguration from subordinate rule switching. Functional MRI and behavioral data were collected from healthy human participants (both male and female). Behaviorally, subordinate rule switches were faster than context switches but were more strongly influenced by task-irrelevant perceptual changes, whereas context switches were relatively insensitive to such interference. To characterize the neural basis of these effects, we introduced a novel measure "neural distance", which quantifies trial-to-trial reconfiguration of multivoxel activity patterns. Across the brain, larger neural distances predicted larger RT switch costs, linking representational reorganization to behavioral performance. Importantly, representational reconfiguration differed across hierarchical levels and anatomical systems. Subordinate rule updating was modulated by perceptual input and expressed in distributed perceptual and motor networks, whereas context reconfiguration engaged the lateral middle frontal cortex and was comparatively insulated from interference. Our results reveal the structure of neural representations supporting flexible updating and interference-shielded contextual representations subserving control behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.