ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026
Overview of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Hormonal Therapies for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Narrative Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clascoterone in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough systemic hormonal therapies (spironolactone, oral contraceptives) are clinically effective for the treatment of acne vulgaris (AV) in female patients, perceived safety concerns have contributed to the growing interest in topical hormonal AV therapies.
methodsWe searched PubMed using the terms "topical," "antiandrogen," "hormonal," "clascoterone," "spironolactone," and "acne vulgaris."
resultsThe majority of articles identified related to clascoterone and topical spironolactone. Clascoterone cream 1% was approved in 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with AV aged 12 years or older based on two Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 1440 patients (722 randomized to clascoterone) and an open-label extension study; other evaluations included a Phase IIa pharmacokinetic study and a Phase IIb RCT. Six clinical studies-mostly small, randomized trials-reported 193 patients treated with topical spironolactone as 5% cream, 5% gel, 2% solution, and 1% nanogel, and 1 RCT evaluated topical flutamide gel in 27 patients. The efficacy and safety of topical spironolactone and flutamide are supported by limited data with some conflicting results; neither agent is approved by the FDA and both must be compounded extemporaneously with no supporting pharmacokinetic data. LIMITATIONS: Clinical studies of topical spironolactone are limited by the small number of patients and wide range of formulations evaluated.
conclusionAvailable evidence supports the use of clascoterone cream 1% and suggests potential benefits and limitations of topical spironolactone in patients with AV; however, for topical spironolactone, pharmacokinetic studies and large-scale RCTs are needed to better characterize both efficacy and safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41648090PMC12872258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.