ArticleIntestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)
Evolution of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: A thirty-year United States perspective.
Article in Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The current state of paediatric intestinal transplantation: A global review.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Review
- The changing landscape of intestinal transplantation: Insights from the first quarter of the 21st century of Eurotransplant experience.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The field of intestinal transplantation has significantly changed since the report of the first successful transplant in 1988. This report seeks to describe the trends in intestinal transplantation utilization and outcomes over time in the United States of America. Methods: We use the cohort of intestinal and multivisceral transplants 1990- Feb 2020 in the UNOS STAR dataset. Eras were defined as 1990-1999, 2000-2009, 2010- Feb 2020. Summary statistics were calculated by era. Patient and death-censored graft survival were assessed by era, stratified by pediatric (<18 years at transplant) and adult recipients. Results: A total of 3035 transplants were performed: 398 in the first era, 1485 in the second, 1235 in the third. The proportion of adult recipients increased over time (35 %, 44 %, 59 % respectively). Fewer livers were included for adults over time (42.8 %, 37.3 %, 36.9 %). One- and five-year patient survival improved over time in children, while adult survival plateaued. A similar trend was observed in death-censored graft survival. Conclusions: A greater proportion of intestinal transplants are now performed in adults, perhaps as a result of improvements in the intestinal rehabilitation of pediatric patients. Graft and patient survival has improved for pediatric patients but not for adults in the past decade, highlighting the ongoing need for improving long-term outcomes in adult recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.