Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648071›Full record

ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2026

Anhedonia and altered reward responsiveness: Relations to psychosocial functioning.

Molly H Sapperstein, Michelle Thai, Yuen-Siang Ang, Diego A Pizzagalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Molly H SappersteinCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Michelle ThaiCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Yuen-Siang AngSocial and Cognitive Computing Department, Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A⁎STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Diego A PizzagalliCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

Funding

Project 4_Bruchas : Circuit-level Approaches for Dissecting Approach/Avoidance Behaviors Mediated by Nociceptin Systems in MiceP50MH119467 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI FRANK, MICHAEL J. · 2020 to 2024
$15.9M
Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in DepressionR37MH068376 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Diego A Pizzagalli · 2016 to 2026
$7.4M
Early Life Stress and Depression: Molecular and Functional Imaging ApproachesR01MH095809 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI DU, FEI, PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2012 to 2024
$6.4M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119467NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095809NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH068376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anhedonia-a core symptom of Major Depressive Disorder-is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, lower quality of life, and disrupted reward processing. However, putative relationships among self-reported anhedonia, well-being and anhedonic phenotypes (specifically, reward learning) remain largely unexplored. The main goal of the current study was to fill this gap in a large online adult community sample (N = 478). Methods: To evaluate how different approaches to assessing anhedonia may capture these relationships, we administered the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) to probe reward learning and two clinical scales: the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS). In a first step, the SHAPS was administered to identify anhedonic vs. non-anhedonic individuals, who then performed an online PRT. Results: Both scales were significantly associated with lower self-reported quality of life (QoL), as measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (QLESQ-SF), with the SHAPS showing a stronger relationship to both QoL and reward learning. Follow-up computational modeling indicated the anhedonic group showed a significantly higher level of uncertainty while completing the PRT compared to the non-anhedonic group. Moreover, trial-by-trial analyses revealed group differences in PRT response patterns, such that anhedonic individuals were less likely to incorrectly indicate that they had seen the more frequently rewarded "rich" stimulus on trials that actually presented the less frequently rewarded "lean" stimulus. Conclusions: Findings highlight the utility of combining subjective and behavioral measures to better understand the impact of anhedonia on daily functioning and reinforcement learning processes.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaDepressionProbabilistic Reward TaskQuality of LifeReward Learning

Identifiers

PMID41648071
PMCPMC12870784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.