ReviewMediterranean journal of rheumatology2026
The Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Management of Dactylitis and Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis.
Review in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dactylitis and enthesitis are hallmark musculoskeletal manifestations of psoriatic arthritis, often signifying a more severe disease phenotype. These domains not only aid early diagnosis but are also associated with radiographic progression, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Objective: This review aims to synthesise current insights into the pathophysiology, clinical impact, imaging assessment, and targeted therapeutic strategies for dactylitis and enthesitis in PsA, within the framework of precision medicine. Methods: A comprehensive analysis of the literature was conducted, focusing on the immunobiology, imaging modalities (ultrasound, MRI), validated clinical scoring systems, and the efficacy of conventional, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs in the treatment of dactylitis and enthesitis. Results: Both manifestations arise from inflammation at the bone-entheseal interface, mediated by biomechanical triggers and the IL-23/IL-17 axis. Dactylitis involves tenosynovitis, soft tissue oedema, and synovitis, while enthesitis reflects inflammation at tendon and ligament insertions. Imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and monitors subclinical disease. TNF and IL-17 inhibitors demonstrate high efficacy in these domains, whereas IL-23 and JAK inhibitors offer promising alternatives. Personalised treatment algorithms now integrate domain predominance, prognostic markers, comorbidities, and patient preferences. Conclusion: Dactylitis and enthesitis represent pivotal, prognostically relevant domains in PsA. Their early recognition and domain-specific management are critical to optimising outcomes. Advances in imaging, novel therapeutic targets, and biomarker-driven strategies hold promise for more effective, individualised care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.