ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Diverging contaminant profiles and prokaryotic assemblages in Arctic and Antarctic lake sediments.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and trace metals are increasingly recognized as critical drivers of ecological change in polar environments. However, their combined impact on sediment microbial communities remains largely unexplored. Methods: We analyzed sediments from 12 high-latitude lakes and ponds, five from the Arctic (Svalbard) and seven from the Antarctic (South Shetland Islands/Deception Island), to examine contaminant profiles (polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs] and trace metals) and prokaryotic community structure using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Finally, we assessed the associations between the identified communities and detected pollutants, and compared these associations across lakes and sites. Results: The results revealed distinct chemical signatures between poles: Arctic sediments were mainly contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (∑PAHs, 18.5-685.7 ppb; phenanthrene was the most abundant), whereas Antarctic sediments showed relatively higher concentrations of chlorobenzenes (∑CBs, 1.9-3.6 ppb) and polychlorinated biphenyls (∑PCBs, 0.9-1.4 ppb), with 2-methylnaphthalene as the most abundant PAH. Manganese was the most abundant metal in both regions, reaching 760 ppm in the Arctic, while elevated arsenic and lead characterized specific Antarctic sites. Amplicon sequencing identified five dominant phyla (i.e., Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, and Desulfobacterota) with significant compositional shifts between poles. Discussion: Notably, the distinct contaminant signatures between regions appeared to be associated with shifts in microbial community composition, suggesting that both the type and intensity of POP and metal exposure may influence bacterial diversity and ecological functions in polar lake sediments. These findings provide a robust baseline for Arctic-Antarctic comparisons, positioning polar lakes as sensitive sentinels of contaminant-driven ecological change. They also underscore the urgent need for functional studies and long-term monitoring to evaluate ecosystem resilience under accelerating climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.