ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025
Managing adverse events in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with bevacizumab.
Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Danish randomized trial of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival andESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Preclinical identification and clinical validation of dynamic biomarkers for trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is refractory to standard chemotherapy, a recommended standard-of-care treatment in the third-line setting is trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) alone or in combination with bevacizumab; other treatment options include fruquintinib or regorafenib. The safety profiles of FTD/TPI and bevacizumab as individual agents are well characterized. Common adverse events (AEs) associated with FTD/TPI include neutropenia, anemia, nausea, and diarrhea, and AEs frequently observed with bevacizumab include hypertension, proteinuria, hemorrhage, venous thromboembolism, and gastrointestinal perforation. Approval of the combination of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with refractory mCRC in the United States and Europe was based on results from the phase III SUNLIGHT trial. There is clinical value in developing a specific set of recommendations for the prevention or management of the key AEs associated with the combination regimen to inform clinical care and improve patient benefit. In this review, we summarize the safety profile of combination treatment with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory mCRC who were enrolled in the SUNLIGHT trial, with a focus on the key AEs of neutropenia, anemia, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, and hemorrhage. In addition, we provide recommendations for the management or prevention of these key AEs in clinical practice, based on published literature and expert opinions on effective strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.