Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647939›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

A joint latent-class Bayesian model with application to ALL maintenance studies.

Damitri Kundu, Sevantee Basu, Manash Pratim Gogoi, Kiranmoy Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damitri KunduStatistical Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
Sevantee BasuStatistical Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
Manash Pratim GogoiTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India.
Kiranmoy DasStatistical Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6132-6309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) is globally the main cause of death from blood cancer among children. While the survival rate of ALL has increased significantly in the first-world countries (e.g. in the United States) over the last 50 years the same is not the case for the developing countries. In this article, we develop a joint latent-class Bayesian model for analysing a dataset from a clinical trial conducted by the Tata Translational Cancer Research Center (TTCRC), Kolkata. The trial considers a group of children who were identified as ALL patients, and were treated with two standard drugs (i.e. 6MP and MTx) over a period of time. Three longitudinal biomarkers (i.e. lymphocyte count, neutrophil count and platelet count) were collected from the patients whenever they visited the clinic (weekly/bi-weekly). We consider a latent-class model for the lymphocyte count which is the main biomarker associated with ALL, and the other two biomarkers, i.e. the neutrophil count and the platelet count are modeled using linear mixed models. The time-to-event is modeled by a semi-parametric proportional hazards model, and is linked to the longitudinal submodels by sharing the Gaussian random effects. The proposed model detects two latent classes for the lymphocyte count, and we estimate the class-specific (average) non-relapse probability at different time points of the study period. We notice a significant difference in the estimated non-relapse probabilities between the two latent classes. Through simulation study we illustrate the accuracy and practical usefulness of the proposed joint latent-class model over the traditional models.

Indexed as

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL)joint modelinglatent class modellongitudinal outcomesMCMC

Identifiers

PMID41647939
PMCPMC12872086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.