ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026
A joint latent-class Bayesian model with application to ALL maintenance studies.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) is globally the main cause of death from blood cancer among children. While the survival rate of ALL has increased significantly in the first-world countries (e.g. in the United States) over the last 50 years the same is not the case for the developing countries. In this article, we develop a joint latent-class Bayesian model for analysing a dataset from a clinical trial conducted by the Tata Translational Cancer Research Center (TTCRC), Kolkata. The trial considers a group of children who were identified as ALL patients, and were treated with two standard drugs (i.e. 6MP and MTx) over a period of time. Three longitudinal biomarkers (i.e. lymphocyte count, neutrophil count and platelet count) were collected from the patients whenever they visited the clinic (weekly/bi-weekly). We consider a latent-class model for the lymphocyte count which is the main biomarker associated with ALL, and the other two biomarkers, i.e. the neutrophil count and the platelet count are modeled using linear mixed models. The time-to-event is modeled by a semi-parametric proportional hazards model, and is linked to the longitudinal submodels by sharing the Gaussian random effects. The proposed model detects two latent classes for the lymphocyte count, and we estimate the class-specific (average) non-relapse probability at different time points of the study period. We notice a significant difference in the estimated non-relapse probabilities between the two latent classes. Through simulation study we illustrate the accuracy and practical usefulness of the proposed joint latent-class model over the traditional models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.