Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647937›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

Bayesian federated inference for survival models.

Hassan Pazira, Emanuele Massa, Jetty A M Weijers, Anthony C C Coolen, Marianne A Jonker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hassan PaziraResearch Institute for Medical Innovation, Science department IQ Health, Research & Education group Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Emanuele MassaDonders Institute, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jetty A M WeijersRadboud Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anthony C C CoolenDonders Institute, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marianne A JonkerResearch Institute for Medical Innovation, Science department IQ Health, Research & Education group Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accurately estimate the parameters in a prediction model for survival data, sufficient events need to be observed compared to the number of model parameters. In practice, this is often a problem. Merging data sets from different medical centers may help, but this is not always possible due to strict privacy legislation and logistic difficulties. Recently, the Bayesian Federated Inference (BFI) strategy for generalized linear models was proposed. With this strategy, the statistical analyzes are performed in the local centers where the data were collected (or stored), and only the inference results are combined to a single estimated model; merging data is not necessary. The BFI methodology aims to compute from the separate inference results in the local centers what would have been obtained if the analysis had been based on the merged data sets. In the present paper, we generalize the BFI methodology as initially developed for generalized linear models to survival models. Simulation studies and real data analyzes show excellent performance; that is, the results obtained with the BFI methodology are very similar to the results obtained by analyzing the merged data. An R package for doing the analyzes is available.

Indexed as

62F0762F1562N0262P1091G70Decentralized datadistributed inferencefederated learningone-shot algorithmrare cancer

Identifiers

PMID41647937
PMCPMC12872092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.