ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2026
Audit of pre-transfusion testing practices in hospital blood banks across Tanzania: A national survey.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Blood transfusion is a lifesaving procedure performed across all healthcare levels in Tanzania. Despite significant investment in blood collection and screening, hospital transfusion practices have received less attention. With haemovigilance systems still in development, the understanding of pre-transfusion testing quality remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate hospital blood bank practices in conducting pre-transfusion procedures prior to issuing blood for transfusion. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to March 2024 in 31 referral hospitals in Tanzania. Data on facility characteristics, testing methods, staffing, and equipment were collected through a validated questionnaire. Data were analysed using STATA version 18. Descriptive statistics were used to present key findings whereby continuous variables were presented as means, and categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Results: Among 31 participating facilities, ABO and Rhesus blood group systems typing and cross-matching were universally available (100%), while antibody screening was available in 13 out of 31 facilities (42.0%). Two out of 31 facilities (6.5%) used the less sensitive tile method for ABO typing. Critical reagents including Anti-D (immunoglobulin G), Anti-Human Globulin, and polythene tubes were available in only 21 out of 31 facilities (67.7%). While all facilities had standard operating procedures (SOPs) for basic tests, blood warming SOPs were available in 9 (29.0%) and fresh frozen plasma thawing SOPs were available in 14 (45.2%) out of 31 facilities. Conclusion: Significant gaps exist in pre-transfusion testing capabilities, SOPs, and essential reagents in Tanzanian referral hospital blood banks. Addressing these shortcomings is crucial for improving transfusion safety and strengthening haemovigilance. What this study adds: This study presents the first national audit of hospital blood bank practices in Tanzania, highlighting major gaps in antibody screening and cross-matching, resource shortages such as key reagents, and quality management deficiencies. It offers evidence-based, phased recommendations to strengthen pre-transfusion testing and improve safety in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.