Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Trends in utilization of imaging among ophthalmic-related emergency department visits in the United States.

Brandon Chou, Serena M Shah, Meghana Kalavar, Jayanth Sridhar, Peter MacIntosh, Andrew G Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brandon ChouBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Serena M ShahIllinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.
Meghana KalavarUCLA Department of Ophthalmology, Olive View-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, United States.
Jayanth SridharUCLA Department of Ophthalmology, Olive View-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, United States.
Peter MacIntoshIllinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.
Andrew G LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advanced neuroimaging use has increased in U.S. emergency departments (EDs), including for neuro-ophthalmic conditions requiring computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their use has shifted in recent years amid changing care patterns and the COVID-19 pandemic. To evaluate these changes, this study examined national trends of CT and MRI use for eye-related ED visits from 2016 to 2022. Materials and methods: A retrospective trend study was conducted using 2016-2022 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) data. Eye-related ED visits involving CT or MRI were identified using standardized diagnostic and procedure codes. Weighted national estimates were calculated, trends were assessed with Joinpoint regression to estimate average annual percent change (AAPC), and multivariable logistic regression identified patient- and hospital-level factors associated with imaging. Results: From 2016 to 2022, eye-related ED visits totaled 42,151,975, involving 15,580,699 advanced imaging studies. Although the number of visits involving imaging remained stable, increasing by 0.8% [2,545,867 in 2016 to 2,566,826 in 2022; Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC): -0.1%], imaging rates per 1,000 visits climbed by 21.8% (AAPC: 3.1%). CT usage declined (2,445,326 in 2016 to 2,412,225 in 2022; AAPC: -1.3%), while MRI usage rose (332,588 in 2016 to 345,153 in 2022; AAPC: 1.0%). Younger age, race (particularly black patients), and Medicaid coverage were associated with reduced likelihood of imaging, while residence in the Midwest or South increased odds. Hospital admission remained the strongest predictor, tripling the likelihood of imaging. The COVID-19 pandemic drove a notable rise in imaging rates (from 34.9% before the pandemic to 40.1%; p=0.003). Conclusion: Advanced imaging use during eye-related ED visits increased from 2016 to 2022 with a shift toward greater MRI utilization and stable CT usage. Demographic factors and the COVID-19 pandemic potentially contributed to these trends and observed racial disparities highlight potential systemic barriers to imaging access. Despite limitations related to hospital representation and data scope, these findings emphasize the need for further research to explore drivers of imaging use and address healthcare inequities.

Indexed as

computed tomographyemergency departmentmagnetic resonance imagingneuroimagingophthalmologytrends

Identifiers

PMID41647930
PMCPMC12867896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.