ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Flood risk prediction and modeling in Bauchi: Leveraging machine learning models and explainable AI for urban resilience.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frequency ratio model for flood susceptibility mapping in Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Floods are amongst the most destructive weather and climate-related disasters, causing significant loss of life and property globally. Accurate flood risk prediction is crucial for improving disaster resilience and urban planning. Methods: This study employed artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models, to predict and model flood risk in Bauchi, Nigeria. Additionally, Explainable AI analysis was utilized to interpret the model outcomes. Results: The study revealed that high-risk areas have a history of frequent and severe flooding based on RF and XGBoost predictions. Settlement formality, elevation, population, and rainfall were the most influential factors in exacerbating flood risk. The RF model outperformed both XGBoost and SVM, with a precision of 0.857 and ROC-AUC of 0.93, while SVM performed the least, with a precision of 0.757 and ROC-AUC of 0.84. Conclusion: The findings provide valuable insights for climate action, particularly in flood risk and exposure, and emphasize the role of urban planning and effective disaster risk reduction strategies in enhancing urban resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.