ReviewThe journal of climate change and health
Climate education as adaptation: A scoping review of programs advancing maternal and newborn health.
Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Climate change is a growing threat to maternal and newborn health (MNH). Alongside urgent emissions reductions, effective efforts to address climate-driven health disparities - both in MNH and more broadly - will require a stronger collective understanding of climate impacts on health. This will necessitate further investment not only in climate and health research, but also in climate and health education and literacy. Critically, the extent to which climate education can or is being used to advance MNH remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of climate education programs specifically focused on MNH. We searched PubMed, Embase, and gray literature through May 2025 and consulted relevant experts. All programs were screened independently and in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved via discussion. Findings: We screened 2,138 papers and programs, 45 of which underwent full text review. Seventeen programs were included in our sample. The majority were implemented in low and middle income countries (LMICs) ( Conclusion: MNH-specific climate education may be an important element of effective climate adaptation, with the potential to enhance climate knowledge and perceived self-efficacy, and improve climate-mediated health outcomes in pregnancy and postpartum. Further research is needed to evaluate existing programs and guide the development of evidence-based policies and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.