ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Prioritizing climate-sensitive zoonotic diseases in Bangladesh: integrating climate hazards, pathogen transmissibility and potential health outcomes.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Projecting the impacts of climate and land-use change on avian influenza suitability in Bangladesh.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Zoonotic diseases, originating in animals and transmissible to humans, pose significant public health challenges globally. Many of these diseases are strongly influenced by climatic variations and extreme weather events, creating a compounded hazard. Bangladesh, a South Asian country highly vulnerable to climate hazards, is particularly at risk given the diversity of disease vectors and the vulnerability of livestock and human populations. Traditional decision-making frameworks often fail to address the complexities and uncertainties of these interactions, resulting in suboptimal disease prioritization for control interventions. Methods: We present the application of a prioritization protocol for climate-sensitive zoonotic diseases in Bangladesh. Using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methodology, the prioritization protocol was tailored to the Bangladesh context, leveraging national expert knowledge while accounting for uncertainty in the expert elicitation process. Results: Our findings highlight that warming, precipitation, and floods were the critical climatic hazards, with pathogen evolution and vector population changes as key transmission mechanisms impacted by the identified climate hazards in Bangladesh. Mortality and transmissibility were deemed to be the most significant health outcomes resulting from the transmission mechanisms affected by the key climate hazards. The prioritization process identified Japanese encephalitis, visceral leishmaniasis, Chikungunya, anthrax and dengue as the most climate-sensitive zoonoses. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to Bangladesh's risk management processes against climate change in the context of zoonotic infectious threats. The results of the structured expert elicitation process emphasize the value of considering uncertainty in expert responses for improving the reliability, credibility, and usefulness of the elicitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.