Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647849›Full record

ArticleThe journal of climate change and health

Specialist physicians' and management personnel's views on climate change mitigation and adaptation in German healthcare facilities: A nationwide survey on attitudes, implementation, and barriers.

Sophie-Charlotte Sasse, Frederick Schneider, Neal Conway, Claudia Doblinger, Kai Kolpatzik, Christian M Schulz, Adrian A W Baumann, Nikolaus Christian Simon Mezger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophie-Charlotte SasseTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Frederick SchneiderTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Neal ConwayTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Claudia DoblingerTechnical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Straubing, Germany.
Kai KolpatzikStiftung Gesundheit, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian M SchulzKLUG - Deutsche Allianz Klimawandel und Gesundheit e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Adrian A W BaumannTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Nikolaus Christian Simon MezgerKLUG - Deutsche Allianz Klimawandel und Gesundheit e.V., Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Climate change poses major challenges for health systems, making mitigation and adaptation measures in healthcare facilities urgent Methods: In September 2022, a nationwide survey was conducted among a representative subset of specialist physicians and healthcare facility management personnel in Germany. As decision-makers in healthcare, this group was surveyed to assess personal attitudes toward climate change and climate-related actions, and healthcare facility-based implementation of mitigation and adaptation measures, as well as possible barriers. Results: Most of the 514 respondents expressed confidence in their ability to contribute to climate change mitigation and a sense of responsibility to do so. Participants indicated that several structural barriers prevented them from taking necessary climate change mitigation and adaptation action at their facilities. A lack of specifically allocated staff, funding, and poorly defined implementation strategies were the most frequently mentioned constraints. Additionally, the respondents indicated a number of measures which their respective facilities had thus far failed to introduce, such as facility-based heat action plans, education programs, and the integration of sustainability into quality control. Conclusion: Despite high awareness and willingness among healthcare decision-makers, climate change mitigation and adaptation measures are poorly implemented in German healthcare facilities. Limited strategies, expertise, staff, and funding may be key barriers. The results highlight the need for stronger governance, funding, and performance metrics to support climate action in German healthcare.

Indexed as

Change managementClimate change adaptationClimate change mitigationGermanyHealthcare leadership

Identifiers

PMID41647849
PMCPMC12851355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.