ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for severe acute radiodermatitis in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute radiodermatitis (ARD) is a frequent and debilitating inflammatory toxicity in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy (RT). In severe cases, ARD may progress to moist desquamation, with the potential for ulceration. Colonization or infection with Methods: We conducted a case series, according to the CARE Statement Guideline, over an eight-month period involving five patients with severe ARD (GRA-L scale ≥ 5) who received aPDT following a standardized protocol. The protocol involved the topical application of methylene blue 1% as the photosensitizer followed by irradiation with a 660-nm diode laser delivering an energy density of 91.836 J/cm Results: aPDT led to significant clinical improvement in all five cases. ARD severity decreased from a mean initial grade of 6 (range: 5-8) to grade 1 in all patients, with no progression to more advanced grades after therapy initiation. Clinical stability was maintained until completion of the prescribed RT course, including the case in which aPDT was initiated during treatment. In the post-RT cases, recovery occurred within 6 to 15 days after aPDT initiation. No adverse effects related to aPDT were observed. Conclusions: This case series provides preliminary evidence that aPDT may assist in the management of severe ARD in patients undergoing head and neck RT. While the observed improvements were encouraging, these findings are exploratory and require confirmation in larger, controlled studies before aPDT can be considered within standardized supportive care approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.