Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647820›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2025

Characterizing racial disparities in follow-up care after open-access colonoscopy.

Alexandria Lenyo, Kyle S Liu, Kasey Hornbuckle, Dayna S Early, Jean Wang, Cassandra D L Fritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandria LenyoDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kyle S LiuDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Kasey HornbuckleDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Dayna S EarlyDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jean WangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Cassandra D L FritzDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Open-access (OA) colonoscopy expands colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services. Although CRC screening disparities have been established, disparities in the completion of follow-up care after an OA colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients who had an OA colonoscopy in 2019 at a large nonprofit academic hospital in St Louis, Missouri, United States. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected for patients who were given a short follow-up interval (<3 years) after the initial OA colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the odds of receiving follow-up care on the basis of sociodemographic factors. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of 2627 patients, 542 (20.6%) received a short-interval follow-up recommendation (mean age 59.8 [standard deviation 8.6 years]; 46.5% female). Most (57.0%) patients identified as a racial minority, with 93.9% (290 of 309) identifying as Black. Only 45.6% (247 of 542) of patients received their recommended short-interval follow-up care. White patients were more likely to receive follow-up care than patients identifying as a racial minority (52.8% vs 40.1%; Conclusions: Minority patients undergoing OA colonoscopy were less likely to receive the recommended short-interval (<3 years) follow-up. Our study suggests that implementing follow-up strategies after OA colonoscopy may be imperative to address disparities in CRC screening and surveillance.

Identifiers

PMID41647820
PMCPMC12850849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.