ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2025
Characterizing racial disparities in follow-up care after open-access colonoscopy.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Open-access (OA) colonoscopy expands colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services. Although CRC screening disparities have been established, disparities in the completion of follow-up care after an OA colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients who had an OA colonoscopy in 2019 at a large nonprofit academic hospital in St Louis, Missouri, United States. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected for patients who were given a short follow-up interval (<3 years) after the initial OA colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the odds of receiving follow-up care on the basis of sociodemographic factors. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of 2627 patients, 542 (20.6%) received a short-interval follow-up recommendation (mean age 59.8 [standard deviation 8.6 years]; 46.5% female). Most (57.0%) patients identified as a racial minority, with 93.9% (290 of 309) identifying as Black. Only 45.6% (247 of 542) of patients received their recommended short-interval follow-up care. White patients were more likely to receive follow-up care than patients identifying as a racial minority (52.8% vs 40.1%; Conclusions: Minority patients undergoing OA colonoscopy were less likely to receive the recommended short-interval (<3 years) follow-up. Our study suggests that implementing follow-up strategies after OA colonoscopy may be imperative to address disparities in CRC screening and surveillance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.