Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647794›Full record

ArticleCase reports in otolaryngology2026

Endonasal Endoscopic Approach for Bone Spicule Removal: A Case Report.

Utku Kubilay, Kaan Işıklar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Utku KubilayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Health Sciences University İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5166-2309
Kaan IşıklarDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Izmir Sehir Hastanesi, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1580-4858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During rhinoplasty surgery, tiny bone spicules (BSs) can form, particularly if blunt tools are used. If these BSs are not noticed and removed intraoperatively, they can cause cosmetic problems and nasal swelling postoperatively. A patient who underwent open rhinoplasty 2 years ago presented with a painless swelling causing cosmetic problems near the left medial canthus. A BS was detected by paranasal sinus computerized tomography and removed using an endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA). At 13 months of postoperative follow-up, the patient reported no complaints. The use of sharpened osteotomes or powered instruments, capable of creating the precise and desired osteotomies, is crucial to prevent the formation of BS. Detecting these BS intraoperatively is also desirable. Administering intravenous corticosteroids, such as prednisolone (1 mg/kg), maintaining hypotensive anesthesia, applying ice packs, and elevating the head 30° during surgery can help reduce edema and aid in the identification of BS. Saline irrigation and surgical field aspiration can facilitate the removal of BS. Final inspection and palpation of the nose from different angles under proper lighting are essential. In cases where BSs are overlooked, an EEA with minimal dissection and no skin scar may be preferred for their extraction. EEA is a minimally invasive, practical, and successful treatment option for BS extraction.

Indexed as

endoscopyminimally invasive surgical proceduresosteotomypostoperative complicationsrhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID41647794
PMCPMC12868984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.