ArticleJRSM cardiovascular disease
Clinical significance of diastolic wall strain in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A cross-sectional observational analysis.
Article in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diastolic wall strain (DWS) is based on linear elastic theory, which shows that impaired diastolic wall thinning reflects resistance to deformation in diastole and thus, increased diastolic myocardial stiffness. We aim to explore the role of DWS in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of correlation with indices of HFpEF. Methods: Study enrolled 53 patients with exertional dyspnoea and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Forty patients fulfilled the criteria for HFpEF according to ESC 2023 criteria. Results: Two groups were analysed - Group 1 with criteria of HFpEF fulfilled and Group 2 with those who did not. Echocardiographic indices including relative wall thickness (RWT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), E/e', left atrial volume index (LAVI) and DWS were numerically different on comparison with group 2, with LVMI, LAVI and E/e' statistically significant. Also mean Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) was found to be -13.05%. Group 1 was divided into HFpEF with DWS ≤ median and HFpEF with DWS > median. Echocardiographic indices showed statistically higher LVMI and atrial filling fraction. This finding showed that patients with reduced DWS were more likely to have diastolic dysfunction. Also, it was found that DWS had a statistically significant correlation with LVMI, LAVI and RWT. Lower DWS had abnormal GLS. Limitations include small sample size. Conclusion: Although difference in DWS between HFpEF and controls did not reach statistical significance, stratification by median value showed significant correlation of DWS with myocardial relaxation parameters. Also, with significant correlation with increased atrial filling fraction higher N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide and correlation with impaired GLS, our study supports DWS as a potential research tool in evaluation of HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.