ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Public health intelligence-ready blueprint for strengthening community resilience: a multi-stakeholder qualitative study in tertiary Chinese hospitals.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hospitals must manage complex lifecycles of equipment, consumables, and infrastructure, yet fragmented legacy systems create silos, inefficiencies, and compliance risks that can heighten organizational vulnerability and weaken hospitals' role as critical infrastructures for community resilience. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders across seven tertiary hospitals in China (administrators; logistics/procurement; facilities/equipment management; clinical representatives) and analyzed transcripts using a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic approach. Results: Findings converged on seven challenge areas: (1) lifecycle and maintenance bottlenecks; (2) logistics gaps in procurement, inventory, and high-value consumable traceability; (3) limited oversight of resources and energy; (4) system usability issues and data fragmentation; (5) unmet needs for intelligent capabilities (e.g., predictive maintenance; inventory/energy dashboards; emergency workflows; compliance automation); (6) insufficient role-specific training; and (7) security and privacy constraints. Participants emphasized the need for low-friction, interoperable tools that are integrated with Hospital Information Systems (HIS), Hospital Resource Planning (HRP), Office Automation (OA), and Supply-Processing- Distribution (SPD) systems, and capable of providing actionable, role-tuned insights to strengthen coordinated action across professional groups in public health operations. Discussion: We propose a five-pillar Intelligence-Readiness Framework and 22 design requirements outlining an incremental pathway from foundational interoperability and governance toward intelligence-ready infrastructure operations, to enhance organizational resilience and contribute to broader community preparedness in public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.