Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647729›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2023

Circulating tumour DNA and MRI circumferential resection margin are key prognostic indicators for survival in rectal cancer.

A Roy, M Shepherdson, K Gormly, S Byrne, S Pedersen, T Price, S Vatandoust, C S Karapetis, G P Young, E L Symonds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A RoyDepartment of Oncology, Flinders Centre For Innovation In Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park.
M ShepherdsonCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park.
K GormlyDepartment of Radiology, Jones Radiology, Eastwood.
S ByrneCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park.
S PedersenClinical Genomics Pty Ltd., North Ryde.
T PriceFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
S VatandoustDepartment of Oncology, Flinders Centre For Innovation In Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park.
C S KarapetisDepartment of Oncology, Flinders Centre For Innovation In Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park.
G P YoungCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park.
E L SymondsCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrence of colorectal cancer has been linked to the presence of methylated circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patient plasma after surgery. The prognostic significance of ctDNA before treatment remains unclear. This study investigated the correlation between pretreatment ctDNA and current radiological [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] prognostic markers in patients with rectal cancer and its association with recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: A total of 42 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled. All patients had staging MRI before treatment. Blood was taken at diagnosis for ctDNA analysis for the presence of either methylated branched chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) or IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1). The correlation of MRI prognostic indicators and ctDNA test results was assessed with chi-square tests. Univariable and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine variables associated with recurrence-free survival and OS. Results: The mean age of patients was 64.4 years (standard deviation 12.5 years), and the majority were male (30/42, 71.4%). A total of 11, 13, 9 and 9 patients were in stages I, II, III and IV, respectively. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 36 months unless disease recurrence or death occurred earlier. A total of 36 (85.7%) patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and 30 (71.4%) underwent surgical resection. The 3-year survival rate was 64%. About 67% (28/42) of patients were positive for the methylated ctDNA at diagnosis. Further, 11 out of 12 patients with a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+) were ctDNA positive; univariable analysis showed that prognostic indicators for OS were presence of extramural venous invasion [EMVI; hazard ratio (HR) 2.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-7.31], CRM+ (HR 10.69, 95% CI 3.51-32.56), metastatic disease (HR 7.7, 95% CI 2.79-21.67) and ctDNA% methylation (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06). The presence of CRM+ and a positive ctDNA had an HR of 19.57 (95% CI 3.47-110.49). In the multivariate analysis, including adjustment for age and EMVI, only the CRM+/ctDNA+ variable was an independent predictor for poor survival (HR 19.57, 95% CI 3.47-110.49). Conclusions: In rectal cancer, almost all patients with CRM involvement have ctDNA, and these patients had the worst prognosis. Future studies with longitudinal ctDNA assessment before and after treatment may potentially inform prognosis and help tailor patients' treatment.

Indexed as

BCAT1IKZF1methylated ctDNAMRIprognosisrectal cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID41647729
PMCPMC12836764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.