ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025
Effectiveness, toxicity and treatment adjustments of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter real-world analysis.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A potential opportunity for complete pathologic and radiographic response.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy, safety, and treatment feasibility of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in patients aged 75 years or older with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a Japanese multicenter retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are contemporary standards of care in first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Real-world evidence remains scarce. Patients and methods: We retrospectively investigated the tolerability and effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab-approved based on the results of the CLEAR trial-under real-world conditions in 145 patients. Results: The median age was 63 years (range 21-87 years). The majority of patients were male (69%) and had a predominant clear-cell histology (88%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 94% of patients, with fatigue (50%), hypertension (39%) and diarrhea (38%) as most common AEs. Grade ≥3 AEs were seen in 59%. Interruption of at least one of the drugs due to toxicities was required in 68% of patients. The dose of lenvatinib was reduced in 56%. The objective response rate was 66%, with 8% of patients achieving a complete remission. Primary progression was seen in 8% of patients. At a median follow-up time of 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3-15.5 months], 35% of patients experienced disease progression. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 76% (95% CI 71.9% to 79.7%). Twenty-one percent of patients died, most of them due to progressive disease. Limitations of our analysis are the short follow-up period and the retrospective nature of the analyses. Conclusions: Our cohort supports the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in a real-world population, including CLEAR-ineligible patients. However, AEs should be closely monitored and treatment should be adapted accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.