ReviewESMO real world data and digital oncology2025
Challenges in analyzing real-world evidence: analysis of androgen deprivation therapy use for prostate cancer in the REASSURE study.
Review in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An understanding of how androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prescribing patterns impact patient outcomes in a real-world setting is needed to help inform treatment decisions and improve the care of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). REASSURE was a retrospective, observational study that described patterns of ADT use derived from the electronic health records of 952 patients with PCa in the CancerLinQ database. Study objectives included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and ADT treatment duration by treatment received [goserelin or other ADTs (leuprorelin, degarelix, or triptorelin)]. While some patterns of ADT use in REASSURE were consistent with recommendations from clinical practice guidelines, there were also some inconsistencies. Findings from REASSURE highlighted the importance of considering potential differences in health care systems, population coverage, and patient data collection between regions, as well as incorporating data from multiple sources to capture data from more diverse patient populations, thus improving the quality of outputs from real-world studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.