ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
The spread of infectious diseases in migration routes between caravans and resident communities: Modelling yellow fever in Central America.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of climate-induced human migration on dengue exposure risk in Africa.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate-sensitive diseases are significantly affected by weather patterns and the social consequences of a changing climate. In this context, epidemics and human mobility can interact, leading to unpredictable impacts on both human and planetary health. Methods: To investigate the impact of yellow fever (YF) vaccination in the context of an outbreak and its association with migration, we use a SEIRV-SEI compartmental deterministic model for humans and vectors and numerical simulations applied to three coupled populations - caravans, endemic and disease-free communities. Two scenarios are evaluated with different vaccination coverage levels at endemic communities and in caravans. Results: When communities endemic to YF are the source of migration, herd immunity is critical, but vaccinating caravans is by far the most significant intervention to protect migrants and disease-free communities upwards from the risk of YF introduction. Conclusion: Preventing outbreaks of climate-sensitive infectious diseases in the context of migration must be a joint effort of common interest. Maintaining vaccination coverage at recommended levels combined with the continued effort to vaccinate people on the move is the only intervention that can prevent a health crisis. Therefore, vaccination against climate-sensitive diseases should be considered climate adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.