ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Preemptive hospital evacuation during the 2021 European floods: A qualitative study on factors influencing decision-making.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In July 2021, several European countries were affected by severe floods, with water levels of the river Meuse reaching a record high. It was decided to completely evacuate VieCuri Medical Center (Venlo, The Netherlands), a hospital located directly adjacent to this river. The aim of this study was to explore the decision-making process of this emergency hospital evacuation. Methods: This descriptive qualitative study assessed factors influencing the decision-making process of this hospital evacuation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 11 key stakeholders. Data were analyzed by reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three themes were constructed from the interviews: risk-assessment and estimation; prior experience; and prerequisites for evacuation. The decision to evacuate was made when there was uncertainty regarding maximum water level forecasts. Therefore, the risks of a hospital evacuation were balanced against the risk of the loss of essential services in case of a dike breach. Prior experiences with crises played a major role, and the use of a national patient coordination center (NPCC), which was established during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabled rapid assessment of the capacity of destination hospitals and facilitated patient transfers. It was determined that prerequisites for evacuation include clear evacuation guidelines, concise communication and collaboration. Conclusion: The decision to evacuate was made when there was uncertainty regarding maximum expected water levels, while administrators balanced the risk of hospital evacuation against the risk of essential services failure in case of a dike breach. Prior experience with crises and the availability of a NPCC were decisive factors in this evacuation procedure. The NPCC allowed for swift identification of available capacity in appropriate destination hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.