ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
Efficacy of herbal medications in managing painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: a systematic review of studies in rodents.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy is conventionally treated with pharmacologic medications such as carbamazepine. Studies have reported that herbal medications (HM) exhibit antinociceptive properties and are helpful in managing painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PPTTN). Objective: The purpose is to systematically review preclinical studies that assessed the antinociceptive efficacy of HM in managing PPTTN. Methods: The focused question was "Can HM reduce PPTTN-related nociception?" A comprehensive search of indexed literature was performed up to and including November 2025. Various keywords were used in different combinations using Boolean operators: Original studies that evaluated the effects of HM on PPTTN-related nociception were included. Study protocols, reviews, editorials, case reports/series, observational studies, and letters-to-the-editor were excluded. The risk of bias (RoB) and quality of evidence were assessed. Results: Four studies on rodents were included. Three studies were performed in rats and one in mice. Protocols for experimental neuropathic pain induction, HM type and delivery and outcome variables were inconsistent in all studies. All studies reported that HM increase the induced pain thresholds in animals with induced PPTTN. Sample-size estimation was performed in none of the studies. The RoB and quality of evidence were graded as "high" and "very low", respectively. Conclusion: The antinociceptive efficacy of HM in the management of experimentally induced PPTTN remains inconclusive, primarily due to methodological inconsistencies within the existing literature. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023486191.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.