ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023
Development of an artificial intelligence tool for detecting colorectal lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of methylene blue dye-based chromoendoscopy and Fujifilm virtual chromoendoscopy (blue light imaging and linked color imaging) for dysplasia detection in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective single-center randomized study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Automation dependence in AI-assisted colonoscopy: impact of system reliability and surgeon experience on navigation performance.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Complementary Roles of Artificial Intelligence and Disease-Specific Optical Diagnosis During Ulcerative Colitis Surveillance: A Prospective Tandem Colonoscopy Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: From current evidence, clinical translation, and the road to precision medicine.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Machine Learning for Colitis-Associated Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence and Future Directions Toward Precision Medicine, a Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: bridging innovation, implementation and impact.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Practices and perceptions of advanced endoscopic imaging techniques for colorectal neoplasia detection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: report of a survey among Canadian inflammatory bowel disease specialists.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
- New Technologies for IBD Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy for early detection of dysplastic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management: Setting New Standards.Cancers · 2025Review
- Navigating Neoplasm Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer and the Comparison With Sporadic Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The impact of artificial intelligence on the endoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease-related neoplasia.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease endoscopy - a review of current evidence and a critical perspective on future challenges.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Review
- Dye-based chromoendoscopy detects more neoplasia than white light endoscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Artificial intelligence has the potential to enhance the endoscopist's ability to detect polypoid and nonpolypoid dysplasia, which could result in decreased rates of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to develop the first known model for computer-aided detection (CADe) of colorectal lesions in patients with IBD. Methods: A CADe model developed at our institution with colorectal lesions from patients without IBD was tested for baseline performance in a dataset of high-definition white-light endoscopy (HDWLE) images of IBD-associated colorectal lesions. Subsequently, we retrained the original CADe to build an IBD-CADe model using 1266 HDWLE still images and 426 dye-based chromoendoscopy still images depicting histologically proven IBD-associated colorectal lesions. The lesions were annotated by histopathology, size, morphology, and inflammation score surrounding the lesion. We evaluated the model's performance metrics before and after retraining. Results: The sensitivity of the original CADe was 50%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 97%, and accuracy was 64%. With the retrained IBD-CADe model, performance metrics for detecting lesions on HDWLE were as follows: sensitivity, 95.1%; specificity, 98.8%; PPV, 98.9%; negative predictive value, 94.7%; accuracy, 96.8%; and area under the curve, .85. IBD-CADe for chromoendoscopy images showed a sensitivity of 67.4%, specificity of 88.0%, PPV of 83.3%, negative predictive value of 74.3%, accuracy of 77.8%, and area under the curve of .65. Subgroup analysis showed a 93% sensitivity for detecting lesions 5 mm or smaller, 91% for lesions 6 to 10 mm, and 85% for those larger than 10 mm. IBD-CADe performed best for Paris classification types Ip, Is, and IIa. Of 9 lesions missed by IBD-CADe, most had a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Conclusions: This model is the first step toward developing other artificial intelligence-based endoscopic tools to enhance dysplasia detection for patients with IBD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.