ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023
Magnetically controlled capsule for assessment of the gastric mucosa in symptomatic patients: a prospective, single-arm, single-center, comparative study.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DuDeM: A Dual-Network Model for Early Gastric Cancer Detection Based on Capsule Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnetically guided gastric capsule endoscopy: a review and new developments.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy: the international experience.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) has the potential to allow an operator to move a video capsule endoscope inside the foregut. The primary objective of this pilot study was to demonstrate that MCCE could visualize the major anatomic regions of the stomach in symptomatic patients before an EGD. Secondary objectives were measuring patient satisfaction, patient safety, and comparing MCCE with a follow-up EGD in the detection of any significant gastric lesions. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, single-center, comparative study, adult patients aged ≥18 years who were referred for an EGD as part of a standard evaluation for symptoms were approached for participation in the study. Participants received MCCE before the EGD. MCCE videos were reviewed by 2 independent physicians and compared with subsequent EGD. Patients were followed for 30 days for safety outcomes and satisfaction. Results: In this study of 40 patients, MCCE detected each of the 6 preidentified major gastric anatomic landmarks with a greater than 95% rate of visualization. Thirty-five patients received a follow-up EGD, and no high-risk lesions were missed with MCCE. Patients preferred MCCE to EGD (80%-13%), and there were no adverse events. Conclusions: In the first pilot study of MCCE in the United States, a high rate of visualization of all regions of the gastric mucosa was achieved. In addition, high satisfaction and no adverse events were recorded. Future studies will focus on higher-risk cohorts to confirm the accuracy of detection of benign, premalignant, and malignant gastric lesions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.