Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647611›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023

Magnetically controlled capsule for assessment of the gastric mucosa in symptomatic patients: a prospective, single-arm, single-center, comparative study.

Andrew C Meltzer, Anita Kumar, Samuel J Kallus, Samuel A Schueler, Nikhil Mattu, Yan Ma, Yijie He, David E Fleischer, David R Cave

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy: the international experience.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew C MeltzerGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Anita KumarGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Samuel J KallusGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Samuel A SchuelerGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Nikhil MattuGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Yan MaDepartment of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yijie HeGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
David E FleischerMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
David R CaveBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) has the potential to allow an operator to move a video capsule endoscope inside the foregut. The primary objective of this pilot study was to demonstrate that MCCE could visualize the major anatomic regions of the stomach in symptomatic patients before an EGD. Secondary objectives were measuring patient satisfaction, patient safety, and comparing MCCE with a follow-up EGD in the detection of any significant gastric lesions. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, single-center, comparative study, adult patients aged ≥18 years who were referred for an EGD as part of a standard evaluation for symptoms were approached for participation in the study. Participants received MCCE before the EGD. MCCE videos were reviewed by 2 independent physicians and compared with subsequent EGD. Patients were followed for 30 days for safety outcomes and satisfaction. Results: In this study of 40 patients, MCCE detected each of the 6 preidentified major gastric anatomic landmarks with a greater than 95% rate of visualization. Thirty-five patients received a follow-up EGD, and no high-risk lesions were missed with MCCE. Patients preferred MCCE to EGD (80%-13%), and there were no adverse events. Conclusions: In the first pilot study of MCCE in the United States, a high rate of visualization of all regions of the gastric mucosa was achieved. In addition, high satisfaction and no adverse events were recorded. Future studies will focus on higher-risk cohorts to confirm the accuracy of detection of benign, premalignant, and malignant gastric lesions.

Identifiers

PMID41647611
PMCPMC12851048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.