Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647590›Full record

ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024

New perspectives in biliary tract cancers.

T O Goetze, C Roderburg, F W Friedrich, J Trojan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T O GoetzeKrankenhaus Nordwest, Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, University Cancer Center, Frankfurt.
C RoderburgClinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
F W FriedrichAstraZeneca GmbH, Hamburg.
J TrojanDepartment of Internal Medicine 1 and University Cancer Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare but highly lethal malignancy. Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis remains dismal, with a median survival of <1 year in most cases. This highlights an urgent medical need for better treatment options, especially in the area of systematic treatments. This review aims to give a concise overview of the current available treatment options for BTC, including a short summary of longstanding therapeutic approaches such as surgery, interventional techniques, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. Special emphasis is placed on genetic alterations and treatment advances with immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, however, including current trials on new immunotherapeutic drugs. Furthermore, the recent recommendation by international guidelines to use durvalumab plus the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin as a first-line treatment in the advanced setting is highlighted and the evidence supporting this recommendation is explored. Moreover, this review looks at genetic alterations which can be used as targets for immunotherapy, especially isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (

Indexed as

biliary tract cancerchemotherapycholangiocarcinomaimmunotherapytargeted therapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID41647590
PMCPMC12836606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.