ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024
PRABITAS study design: a pragmatic, randomized phase III trial of bi-weekly versus conventional trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase II study of intrapatient dose escalation of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (E-BiTS study).ESMO open · 2025Trial
- A New Era of Salvage-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Role and Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is the established therapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, but there are concerns regarding the regimen's complexity and hematotoxic effects, especially for patients with organ dysfunction, comorbidities, or a reduced performance status-groups often excluded from conventional clinical trials. Preliminary studies demonstrated that bi-weekly FTD/TPI + BEV may mitigate these hematotoxic effects compared with the conventional schedule without compromising efficacy. No clinical trials, however, have directly compared these two regimens. Therefore, we initiated the PRABITAS trial, a multicenter, randomized, phase III non-inferiority trial, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bi-weekly FTD/TPI + BEV compared with conventional FTD/TPI + BEV. This was designed as a pragmatic trial, a novel approach in clinical trials aiming to aid decision-making in daily practice by mimicking real-world clinical settings. The PRABITAS trial incorporates minimal eligibility criteria to include a more representative patient population, allows flexibility in intervention adherence and assessment, and employs streamlined data collection to reduce the burden on both patients and healthcare providers. The primary endpoint is overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Launched in December 2023, the trial aimed to enroll a total of 890 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.