Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647584›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024

Clinical implementation of simultaneous multiple biomarkers testing for metastatic or recurrent gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a single-institutional experience.

U Okazaki, I Nakayama, N Sakamoto, T Kuwata, A Kawazoe, M Yoshida, M Yura, Y Matsubara, A Jubashi, S Sato and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognosis-predicting factor of gastrectomy after systemic cancer therapy for cStage IVB gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

U OkazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
I NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
N SakamotoDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
T KuwataDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
A KawazoeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
M YoshidaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
M YuraDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Y MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
A JubashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
S SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
S UshiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Y MiyashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
A KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
T HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
S MishimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
D KotaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Y NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Y KubokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
H BandoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
T KojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
T YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
T KinoshitaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
K ShitaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evaluating multiple biomarkers including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), mismatch repair (MMR) status, programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is essential for selecting appropriate first-line therapy of metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA). However, this can be challenging if tumor tissue amount is limited and may cause delays in the initiation of chemotherapy. Therefore, we assessed the feasibility of multiple biomarkers testing in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records of treatment-naïve patients with mGEA who underwent prospective multiple biomarkers testing between April 2022 and October 2023 in our institution. Eight biomarker status including HER2, MMR, PD-L1, CLDN18.2, Epstein-Barr virus, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, epidermal growth factor receptor and mesenchymal epithelial transition expressions were simultaneously examined using biopsy or surgical specimens. Results: A total of 203 patients with mGEA were analyzed. Most patients underwent gastroendoscopy and tumor biopsy shortly after referral to our institution. Biomarkers testing was successfully completed on the first attempt in 198 patients (97.5%). With additional steps including additional biopsy or asking remaining tumor samples from the referring hospital, the biomarker results were eventually available in all cases. The median turnaround time from sample collection to reporting results was 7 days. Consequently, 178 patients (87.7%) could receive first-line treatment after obtaining the biomarker status. Conclusions: Multiple biomarkers testing for patients with mGEA was feasible in clinical practice. Establishment of a testing infrastructure based on the collaboration with multiple departments is essential for implementing biomarker-driven precision treatment.

Indexed as

biomarkerclinical practicegastroesophageal adenocarcinomaimmunohistochemistrypersonalized treatment

Identifiers

PMID41647584
PMCPMC12836672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.