ReviewFundamental research2026
Revegetation re-carbonizes soil: Patterns, mechanisms, and challenges.
Review in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revegetation has been widely implemented throughout the world for controlling soil loss, conserving biodiversity, increasing ecosystem productivity, mitigating climate change, and contributing to soil carbon (C) sequestration. However, systematic knowledge is still lacking regarding the variations, mechanisms, and challenges in soil C sequestration after revegetation despite its crucial role in resolving the ongoing C sink/source debate and achieving the C neutrality targets. In this review, we summarize the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in restored ecosystems based on existing studies at multiple spatial and temporal scales and the mechanisms associated with C stabilization in soils after revegetation, and suggest future research into soil C in restored ecosystems. Revegetation, i.e. grassland restoration or afforestation/reforestations, significantly increases the SOC sequestration by 21.4% with rapid SOC accumulation in the initial few years (generally within 30 years), followed by a relatively stable stage. We also clarified the three key mechanisms (including physical protection within soil aggregates, chemical protection by interacting with organo-mineral associations, and inherent biological recalcitrance protection) associated with SOC stabilization in soils after revegetation. Revegetation re-carbonizes soil by increasing new inputs of C and decreasing the ratio of soil C outputs to new inputs of C (i.e., increasing the decomposition of SOC and reducing erosional SOC loss), both of which promote SOC sequestration. Based on the key issues identified in this review, future research should focus on the fate of C sequestrated in soils after revegetation, and feedback to environmental changes and human activities in order to achieve C neutrality by around 2050.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.