ArticleFundamental research2026
Augmented reality navigation for precise implantation of LC2 pelvic tunnel screws in minimally invasive surgery.
Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Innovations in pelvic tumor surgery : Review and outlook].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the considerable risk of trauma, traditional open surgery has been gradually replaced by minimally invasive surgery using tunnel screws. However, during minimally invasive pelvic surgery, surgical navigation can be improved by effectively using the augmented reality technique. This can further improve the accuracy of the surgery and reduce risks. Methods: This study adopts a registration approach based on the patient coordinate system and uses a specific manual setting comparison method to select the suitable 3D corner detection parameters. Results: After experiments, this strategy can effectively improve the accuracy of positioning during surgery. It achieves a balance in detection time and accuracy, which further reduces risks and injuries during surgery. Conclusions: Our technique can achieve more precise and safer results during minimally invasive pelvic surgery, which shows its great value and potential in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.