Promising porous materials for uranium extraction from seawater.

Mengjie Hao, Yinghui Xie, Zhongshan Chen, Hui Yang, Geoffrey I N Waterhouse, Shengqian Ma, Xiangke Wang

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Rational Synthesis of Extended π-Conjugated Covalent Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Photocatalytic Uranium(VI) Removal.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengjie HaoCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Yinghui XieCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Zhongshan ChenCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Hui YangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Geoffrey I N WaterhouseSchool of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

Shengqian MaDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201, United States.

Xiangke WangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uranium extraction from seawater is a promising approach for ensuring continued uranium fuel supply to the nuclear power industry. However, extracting uranium by this route is challenging due to the low concentration of uranium, high ionic strength, and marine micro-organisms in seawater. Recently, a range of novel porous adsorbent materials have been developed for uranium extraction from ocean water. These adsorbents rely on specific pore characteristics and functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, amidoxime, phosphate, etc.) to achieve a high affinity and selectivity for uranyl ions (UO

Indexed as

AdsorbentAdsorption-electrocatalystAdsorption-photocatalystPorous materialsSeawaterUranium extraction

Identifiers

PMID41647566

DOI10.1016/j.fmre.2024.03.004

PMCPMC12869741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.