Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41647535›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2026

Data tells the truth: A Knowledge distillation method for genomic survival analysis by handling censoring.

Xiu-Shen Wei, He-Yang Xu, Ye Wu, Xiaoming Liu, Ruru Gao, Jiacheng Liu, Bowen Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiu-Shen WeiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
He-Yang XuSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Ye WuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Xiaoming LiuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Ruru GaoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Jiacheng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Bowen DuDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival analysis is a critical tool for cancer research, yet handling censored data remains challenging due to supervision bias and inaccurate hazard estimates. To address these issues, we propose a simple but effective method termed KD, which employs knowledge distillation using uncensored data to rectify the supervision bias in censored data. This approach leverages the combined power of both rectified censored data and uncensored data to improve survival prediction accuracy. Remarkably, our KD method not only effectively harnesses censored data but also better reflects clinical reality, demonstrating its immense value in survival analysis. We applied our KD method to 19 target cancer sites using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Our results consistently outperform traditional machine learning and deep learning-based methods across both target cancer sites and independent cancer cohorts. More importantly, our data-driven approach enables the model to extract hidden information from censored data, leading to conclusions that align more closely with clinical knowledge and scenarios. This validation of our KD method's effectiveness highlights the substantial value of rational censored data usage, providing valuable insights for cancer research and clinical decisions. All data and codes are freely available at: https://datatellstruth.github.io/.

Indexed as

Censored dataKnowledge abductionKnowledge distillationMachine learningSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41647535
PMCPMC12869744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.