ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Semiautomated breast ultrasound report generation using multimodal large language models and deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Large language models for analyzing contrast-enhanced ultrasound reports of pancreatic cystic lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast ultrasound (US) imaging is essential for early breast cancer detection, yet generating diagnostic reports is labor-intensive, particularly when incorporating multimodal elastography. Methods: This study presents a novel framework that combines multimodal large language models and deep learning to generate semiautomated breast US reports. This framework bridges the gap between manual and fully automated workflows by integrating radiologist annotations with advanced image classification and structured report compilation. A total of 2,119 elastography images and 60 annotated patient cases were retrospectively collected from two US machines. Results: The system demonstrated robust performance in elastography classification, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92, 0.91, and 0.88 for shear-wave, strain, and Doppler images, respectively. In the evaluated dataset, the report generation module correctly identified all suspicious masses across both US machines, achieving 100% sensitivity in lesion detection, with an average report generation time of 31 s per patient using the GE Healthcare machine and 36 s using the Supersonic Image machine. Discussion: The proposed framework enables accurate, efficient, and device-adaptable breast US report generation by combining multimodal DL and prompt-based LLM inference. It significantly reduces radiologist workload and demonstrates potential for scalable deployment in real-world clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.