ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Distinguishing nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease from pulmonary tuberculosis using radiomics machine learning models from CT images.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based differentiation of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease and pulmonary tuberculosis using chest CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model based on CT radiomics for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD) and pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Materials and methods: Retrospectively, chest CT images with NTM-LD and PTB patients confirmed at Medical Center 1 between January 2019 to December 2024 were collected. The dataset was divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Additionally, patients from medical center 2 were collected for external test. A radiomics model was constructed using five machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), YeoJohnson_LR, and YeoJohnson_LR (LDA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the five models, and the optimal prediction model was obtained. The optimal model was compared with three radiologists in the testing cohort. Results: A total of 1,512 cases were included, including 1,407 cases from Center 1 (NTM-LD: 547; PTB: 860) and 105 patients from Center 2 (NTM-LD: 32; PTB: 73). Patients in the NTM-LD group were significantly older than those in the PTB group ( Conclusion: The YeoJohnson_LR (LDA) model can be used to distinguish NTM-LD from PTB, assisting in rapid clinical diagnosis and benefiting patients with NTM-LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.