ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Sonographic Evaluation of Tendinous Mallet Finger to Estimate the Extent of Extension Lag.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several reports have addressed tendinous mallet finger (TMF), they have not identified which method best informs surgeons about the extent of residual extension lag in these patients. We aimed to assess the association between sonographic classification of acute TMF and the degree of extension lag remaining at the final follow-up. Methods: The inclusion criterion was acute TMF with symptom onset within 2 weeks. Thirty-eight patients (23 male and 15 female) participated, with a mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range, 12.3-23.5 months). Range of motion, including extension lag, was measured at both the initial presentation and the final follow-up. All patients were managed conservatively using a finger splint for a period exceeding 6 weeks. Ultrasonography was performed for all participants to assess the severity of terminal extensor tendon injury. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between sonographic type and extension lag at final follow-up. Results: At initial presentation, the mean extension lag was 46.0°, which improved to 17.5° at the last follow-up. TMF cases were categorized into 3 sonographic types (hypo-echoic, thinned, and wavy) based on ultrasound characteristics. A significant difference in extension lag at final follow-up was observed among the TMF groups ( Conclusions: Sonographic assessment of TMF can aid in predicting residual extension lag in patients with TMF undergoing conservative treatment with a finger splint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.