ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2025
Evolution of Advanced Combination Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite multiple new advanced therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), almost half of patients do not achieve clinical remission and the number requiring intestinal resection has not significantly changed in over 20 years. To address the therapeutic ceiling seen with single-agent biologics or small molecules, clinicians have attempted combination therapy, known as advanced combination treatment (ACT), to target multiple inflammatory pathways involved in IBD pathogenesis. ACT may be particularly helpful for patients with long-standing refractory disease and those with extraintestinal manifestations. Initial trials have supported the safety and efficacy of ACT, showing clinical and endoscopic remission rates of 59% and 34%, respectively, and response rates of 69% and 43%, respectively, and few new safety signals. However, increased adverse events are seen in patients combining ACT and immunomodulators or corticosteroids. Conclusions are limited by the lack of robust randomized controlled trial evaluation and aggregate analysis of outcomes. This article will review the available data on the use of specific ACT regimens in IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41647471PMC12872266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.