ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Enhanced cattle identification using Siamese network and MobileViT with EMA attention.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of individual cattle is paramount in livestock insurance to combat fraud. However, the performance of existing muzzle recognition methods degrades in complex scenarios involving occlusion or multi-angle views. This study addresses this limitation by first constructing a comprehensive cattle muzzle image dataset encompassing frontal, multi-angle, and occluded conditions. We then propose CattleMuzzleNet, a lightweight recognition model that integrates a siamese network, an enhanced MobileViT backbone, and an Efficient Multi-scale Attention (EMA) mechanism for robust feature extraction and matching. Its efficacy is systematically validated through comparative experiments on feature extraction networks, ablation studies on the attention mechanism, and confidence threshold analysis. Evaluated on a dataset of 31,312 images from 658 cattle, CattleMuzzleNet achieved an accuracy of 97.87% and an F1-score of 98.89%, with a compact model size of 6.9 MB. The results demonstrate high accuracy and robustness in complex scenarios, providing an effective technical solution for identity verification in cattle insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.