ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2025
Colon insufflation and visualization management using a novel rectal seal device.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Inadequate insufflation is a common problem during colonoscopies, with gas leakage from the anus hindering luminal visualization. This study examines the prevalence of this problem through a survey of gastroenterologists, which motivated the development of our insufflation leakage management rectal seal device, RECSEAL. Methods: The RECSEAL was developed based on the need identified from gastroenterologists regarding the rate and management methods of inadequate insufflation. The RECSEAL, measuring 55 mm in diameter and 50 mm in length, was designed and silicone injection-molded to safely insert and reside in the anal canal without migrating or hindering movement of the colonoscope. To evaluate the RECSEAL, a colonoscope was outfitted with a pressure sensor to measure colonic pressure while visualizing the lumen in a bench, ex vivo, and in vivo in pig models. In the ex vivo study, a small injury was introduced to the anal sphincter to simulate poor anal tone. Results: The survey reported a rate of inadequate insufflation of 6.6% that required intervention using gluteal pressure maneuvers. In bench testing and the ex vivo model, the RECSEAL maintained lumen pressures in which both an intact and an injured anal sphincter showed significantly higher ( Conclusions: The flexible RECSEAL allowed higher luminal pressures in the colon and may improve colon insufflation and visualization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.