ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025
Cancer in public figures, 2010-2020.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The public perception of cancer is often influenced through news stories on public figures diagnosed with cancer. However, most stories lack granular details on cancer type, treatment, and prognosis, which may create more doubt rather than clarity for readers. We sought to understand how news stories portray cancer in public figures. Materials and methods: News stories with a cancer headline that were published between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 were identified using Google News. Results: We identified 4135 news articles with a cancer headline published between 2010 and 2020, of which 254 articles specifically discussed a public figure with cancer. Many articles did not specify the type of cancer, prognosis, or staging. When a public figure's prognosis was specified, the individual was described as already deceased or portrayed as being incurable or having a poor prognosis. Many news articles did not specify the type of cancer therapy that an individual received or was expected to receive. Conclusion: News articles describing cancer in a public figure between 2010 and 2020 often did not specify the cancer type, prognosis, or treatment. Most news articles did not contain any educational information on the cancer described in the article. The public should be cognizant that news articles about high-profile individuals with cancer often contain a noteworthy lack of details about cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.