ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025
Core variables for real-world clinicogenomic data collection in precision oncology.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04529122 (A Registry to Collect Characteristics and Outcomes From Patients With Solid Tumors Profiled With a Next-Generation Sequencing Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Registry to Collect Characteristics and Outcomes From Patients With Solid Tumors Profiled With a Next-Generation Sequencing Test (WAYFIND-R)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- How life-cycle real-world evidence can bridge evidentiary gaps in precision oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precision oncology evidence gaps may be bridged using real-world clinicogenomic data; however, current limitations compromise real-world data collection and evidence generation. We aimed to define a set of precision oncology core variables that can aid in fit-for-purpose real-world data collection to be used for a range of purposes and by various stakeholders based on the approach adopted when designing the WAYFIND-R registry (NCT04529122). Materials and methods: A panel of precision oncology experts created a list of variables based on standard dictionaries and vocabularies, which was aligned with the European Medical Agency's draft guidelines for registry-based studies. A list of core variables was selected from the initial broad list of variables. Results: The initial overall list (∼500 variables) was consolidated to ∼150 variables that covered the entirety of the patient journey in oncology. The panel gave highest priority to patient demographics, socioeconomic information and comorbidities, cancer details, molecular information, particularly predictive biomarkers in routine use and next-generation sequencing technical aspects, systemic cancer therapies and other treatments, outcome assessments and survival outcomes. Conclusions: The core oncology variables represent a harmonized list of key clinicogenomic data elements that can be collected during a patient's journey in oncology and leveraged for their primary intended purpose of molecular tumor board decision making, and might be used for further secondary research purposes, if legal requirements allow. Definition of this list of core variables will help generate evidence from research- or regulatory-oriented precision oncology studies by ensuring synergy, dataset connectivity, and interoperability across different data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.