ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025
Data analytics for real-world data integration in TKI-treated NSCLC patients using electronic health records.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enabled Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Statistical Perspective for Regulatory Decisions.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Real-world data (RWD) are routinely collected in clinical practice during therapeutic interventions. Data warehouses (DWHs) represent the primary source of RWD in which electronic health records (EHRs) can be rapidly analyzed via natural language processing. This study illustrates an analytic framework that systematically exploits RWD and methods to generate real-world evidence (RWE) about innovative cancer drugs. The framework has been applied to investigate real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Materials and methods: Data from a cohort of 190 epidermal growth factor receptor-positive mutation (EGFRm) patients with aNSCLC were retrospectively collected in an Italian cancer institute between 2014 and 2022. Patients were treated in first-line (1L) with osimertinib or other TKIs (non-osimertinib). A text-mining algorithm was implemented to retrieve RWD from EHRs. Survival endpoints were median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) and median overall survival (mOS) estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Time-dependent multivariate Cox analysis was carried out to overcome immortal time bias. Results: Approximately 38% of patients received 1L osimertinib, while the remaining 62% received previous-generation TKIs. Longer mTTD [15 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.9-26.4 months] was found for patients treated with 1L osimertinib compared with non-osimertinib (10 months; 95% CI 7.9-13.1 months). In multivariate analysis, osimertinib was an independent protective factor regardless of bone and brain metastases and local radiotherapy. mOS was 27 months (95% CI 21.4-39.5 months) for osimertinib versus 20.2 months (95% CI 17.6-23.1 months) for non-osimertinib. Conclusions: Data analytics frameworks are useful tools to integrate RWE in cancer research and data-driven models are suitable to process large amounts of RWD. This study demonstrates that real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of TKIs are comparable with those found in both clinical trials and other real-world studies. RWE studies can support clinicians in investigating the best treatment strategy and decision makers to drive new health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.