ReviewEngineering in life sciences2026
Process Systems Engineering in Precision Medicine: Opportunities in Autologous CAR-T Therapy.
Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo CAR-Based Immune Cell Engineering: Future Applications and Challenges in Malignant Glioma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: Up Close and Personal.JMIR cancer · 2026Review
- Process Systems Engineering in Precision Medicine: Opportunities in Autologous CAR-T Therapy.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Review
- Engineering the future of advanced therapy medicinal products: a bioengineering call to action.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A proposal of good manufacturing practices (GMP) laboratory for CAR T-cell therapy in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapies have given hope to many cancer patients whose other lines of treatment have failed. Unfortunately, limited manufacturing capability has resulted in many patients dying while on a waitlist. Similarly, since clinical trial treatments are personalized, it is difficult to treat many patients simultaneously, resulting in longer clinical trials. Therapeutic production often takes over 4 weeks, so a product failure means that a patient may need to wait another month for treatment, putting them at severe risk for disease progression. The labor-intensive manufacturing process has led to therapeutic costs of roughly $500,000 per treatment, which can be reduced by better automation and shorter manufacturing times. The goals of this article are to review CAR-T therapeutics development, manufacturing, and treatment, and to encourage the development of data analytics-based multi-scale decision support tools for all humans "in the loop." A systems approach is needed since prior treatments and current state of health (including the immune system and microbiota), initial cell quality, manufacturing failure, bridging and lymphodepletion therapy before infusion, and supply chain management, all impact treatment success. Continuous updates as more patient data are made available can lead to better treatment recommendations and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.