ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical practice: the point of view of Italian patients.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Development of a patient-reported outcomes registry for patients with brain tumours (BEACON).ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in routine oncology practice: a scoping review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Digital integration of narrative medicine and patient-reported outcome measures to improve understanding of quality of life in metastatic breast cancer: the PERGIQUAL study.The oncologist · 2025Observational
- Statewide integration of electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine oncology care: a mixed-methods implementation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Breast-cancer specific comprehensive archive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for clinical research and clinical practice in oncology: Results from the PRO4All project.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline recommended the adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROMs) in routine clinical practice for patients with cancer. The aim of this survey is to identify the critical issues that would arise in the implementation of ePROMs in daily oncology clinical practice from patients' view. Materials and methods: From March to April 2023, outpatients with cancer treated at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin (Italy) filled in a paper questionnaire. Seven questions dealt with the respondents' characteristics, eight questions with the satisfaction about the current method used to collect information about patients' symptoms and toxicities, and the opinion about several potentially critical issues for the implementation of ePROMs. Results: Two hundred and twenty patients completed the survey. In current clinical practice, symptoms are mostly collected through verbal questions and paper-based questionnaires. Seventy-two percent of patients were satisfied with these methods; 82% were in favor of using ePROMs. Most patients were not concerned about privacy (82%), while a minority was concerned about possible lack of interest by clinicians in the symptoms digitally reported (14%) and the possible negative impact on doctor-patient relationship (39%). Seventy-seven percent of respondents declared to be familiar with technological tools and 83% were confident with the availability of internet connection. Conclusions: In our center, most patients are satisfied with current methods of symptom monitoring and would also be in favor of the introduction of ePROMs. However, several aspects still need to be addressed for universal implementation of ePROMs in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.